Assessment of Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) During CT Pelvimetry Using Monte Carlo Simulation

M. Aabid, S Semghouli, A. Choukri

Abstract


A pelvimetry examination is sometimes prescribed to a pregnant woman at the end of her pregnancy in order to assess the dimensions of her pelvis prior to childbirth. This examination has long been performed by using X-ray, but is now increasingly being replaced by CT-scan The objective of this study is to assess the radiation doses received during a practical CT pelvimetry examination performed using a Hitashi Supria 16-slice CT scanner. The radiation doses were estimated using Monte Carlo (MC)-based simulation with GATE code to model the 16-slice CT scanner machine. The GATE code operates using GEANT4 libraries. A polyymethyl metacrylate (PMMA) acrylic phantom of 32 cm diameter was modeled to represent the patient's body. X-ray energy spectrum generated using the SRS-78 spectrum processor was used for simulation. The simulation was executed with the same exposure parameters as the practical CT pelvimetry examination with dose parameters of 1 mGy, 0.9 mGy, and 36.6 mGy.cm, respectively, for the weighted CT dose index (CTDIw), the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose-length product (DLP). The MC simulation results provide dose parameters of 1.16 mGy, 1.07 mGy, and 43.6 mGy.cm, respectively, for the CTDIw, CTDIvol, and DLP. The differences between the simulation and the practical examination were 16 %, 18 %, and 18 %, respectively. These differences are considered in a quite good agreement. The results were also consistent with other similar studies. This work proves that the Monte Carlo simulation with the GATE code is usable to assess the patient doses during a CT pelvimetry examination.


Keywords


CT pelvimetry examination; Monte carlo simulation; CTDI; GATE code

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Lallemant, T. Ceri, Y. Offringa et al., Arch. Gynecology Obstet. 304 (2021) 919.

T. Ishimatsu, M. Naito, K. Kinoshita et al., J. Orthop. Sci. 22 (2017) 531.

B. Abdennebi, S. Aubry, L. Ounalli et al., Phys. Med. 33 (2017) 77.

T. Kitai, Y. Hyodo and H. Morikawa, Jpn. J. Med. Radiol. Tech. 76 (2020) 16.

R. Smith-Bindman, Y. Wang, P. Chu et al., BMJ 364 (2019) 1.

M. Aabid, S. Semghouli, B. Amaoui et al., Patient Radiation Risks during CT Brain procedure in Moroccan hospitals, 2019 International Conference of Computer Science and Renewable Energies (ICCSRE) (2019) 4.

S. Semghouli, B. Amaoui, A. E. Kharras et al., Perspect. Sci. 12 (2019) 100407.

M. Aabid, S. Semghouli, B. Amaoui et al., Indian J. Public Health Res. Dev. 10 (2019) 713.

S. Semghouli, B. Amaoui, M. Aabid et al., Mater. Today Proc. 52 (2022) 13.

M. Aabid, S. Semghouli, O.K. Hakam et al., Establishment of diagnostic reference level of abdominopelvic CT procedure of university hospital center Mohammed VI, Oujda, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart City Applications (2019) 4.

S. Semghouli, B. Amaoui, A. E. Kharras et al., Int. J. Adv. Res. 5 (2017) 319.

S. Semghouli, M. Aabid, B. Amaoui et al., Mater. Today Proc. 52 (2022) 85.

P. Rajaraman, M. Hauptmann, S. Bouffler et al., Ann. ICRP 47 (2018) 126.

E. Burgio, P. Piscitelli and L. Migliore, Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 15 (2018) 1971.

M. Kopp, T. Loewe, W. Wuest et al., Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 9475.

N. Chatzisavvas, G. Priniotakis, M. Papoutsidakis et al., Ann. Emerging Technol. Comput. 5 (2021) 36.

P. Arce, D. Bolst, M. C. Bordage et al., Med. Phys. 48 (2021) 19.

B. Van, Y. K. Dewaraja, J. T. Niedbala et al., Med. Phys. 50 (2023) 540.

C. O. Thiam, Dosimétrie en Radiothérapie et Curiethérapie par Simulation Monte-Carlo GATE sur Grille Informatique, Ph.D. Thesis, Université Blaise Pascal-Clermont-Ferrand II (1970).

S. Jan, G. Santin, D. Strul et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 49 (2004) 4543.

K. Shahgeldi, M. Parenmark, T. M. Svahn et al. Dose assessment of recently introduced low-dose protocol in computed tomography pelvimetry to conventional techniques, European Congress of Radiology (2018) 1.

E. Phexell, M. Söderberg and A. Bolejko, Int. J. Radiol. Radiat. Ther. 5 (2018) 243.

Semghouli, B. Amaoui, O. K. Hakam et al., Rad. Phys. Chem. 175 (2020) 108087.

D. Villoing, S. Marcatili, M. P. Garcia et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 62 (2017) 1885.

M. Talbi, M. Aabid, M. E. Mansouri et al., Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 76 (2021) S103.

P. Meyer, E. Buffard, L. Mertz et al., Br. J. Radiol. 77 (2004) 224.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55981/aij.2023.1214



Copyright (c) 2023

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.