Gamma Radiation Shielding Properties of Slag and Fly Ash-based Geopolymers

M. W. Hasan, S. Sugiharto, S. Astutiningsih

Abstract


Industrial waste-based geopolymer cement is a greener alternative to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) for radiation shielding with comparable mechanical properties without the production of CO2 during synthesis. In this paper, the linear attenuation coefficient of slag and fly ash-based geopolymers, unmodified by aggregates, is measured and used to calculate the mass attenuation coefficients, half-value layer (HVL), and tenth-value layer (TVL) of the geopolymers. Narrow Beam Gamma Spectrometry with gamma energy of 0.662 MeV, 1.173 MeV, and 1.332 MeV was used to irradiate a series of slag and fly ash-based geopolymer paste of cylindrical shape with a diameter of 7.5 cm and height of 9.5 cm. Slag geopolymer has linear attenuation coefficient of 0.1642/cm, 0.1237/cm, 0.1150/cm, mass attenuation coefficient of 0.0782 cm2/g, 0.0589 cm2/g, 0.0548 cm2/g, the HVL of 4.222 cm, 5.609 cm, 6.056 cm, and TVL of 14.025 cm, 18.633 cm, 20.118 cm, respectively. Fly ash geopolymer has linear attenuation coefficient of 0.1387/cm, 0.1075/cm, and 0.0964/cm, mass attenuation coefficient of 0.0761 cm2/g, 0.0589 cm2/g, 0.0529 cm2/g, HVL of 4.998 cm, 6.453 cm, 7.202 cm, and TVL of 16.603 cm, 21.437 cm, 23.926 cm, respectively. Test samples made from slag-based geopolymers have a better shielding capability compared to fly ash-based geopolymers due to having higher attenuation coefficients as well as lower HVL and TVL, thus requiring less material to absorb radiation of the same energy level.


Keywords


Geopolymer; Radiation Shielding; Attenuation Coefficient; Half-value Layer; Tenth-value Layer

Full Text:

PDF

References


J. K. Shultis and R. E. Faw, Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering, CRC Press, Florida (2017).

T. A. Aragaw, Concise Introduction to Cement Chemistry and Manufacturing; Synthesis Lectures on Engineering, Morgan&Claypool, California (2018).

R. M. Andrew, Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11 (2019) 1675.

U. Arachchige, J. Devasurendra, L. Chathumini et al., Int. J. Res. 6 (2019) 631.

J. Davidovits, Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications 5th Edition, Institut Géopolymère, Saint-Quentin, France (2020).

U. D. Prastiwi, Synthesis and Work Simulation of Concrete Composite based Nuclear Radiation Shielding against X-ray/Gamma Ray and Neuron Exposure, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor (2017).

Nurhasmi, D. Tahir, B. Abdullah et.al., Mater. Sci. Forum 966 (2019) 41.

S. Shalbi, M. Jaafar, N. Alrawi et.al., IOSR J. Appl. Phys. 9 (2017) 51.

T. Shams, M. Eftekhar and A. Shirani, Constr. Build. Mater. 182 (2018) 35.

B. Aygün, J. Rad. Res. Appl. Sci. 12 (2019) 352.

M. A. Masoud, A. M. El-Khayatt, W. A. Kansouh et.al., Constr. Build. Mater. 263 (2020) 120141

M. Awadallah, M. M. A. Imran, J. Environ. Radioact. 94 (2007) 129

Y.-M. Liew, C.-Y. Heah, A. B. M. Mustafa et.al., Prog. Mater. Sci. 83 (2016) 595.

D. D. B. Nergis, M. M. A. B. Abdullah, P. Vizureanu et. al., IOP Conference Series: Material Science and Engineering 374 (2018) 012019

S. Astutiningsih, B. Suharno, 6th International Slag Valorization Symposium (2019) 269.



DOI -


https://doi.org/10.17146/aij.2021.1076



Copyright (c) 2021 Atom Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.